Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Salmonella serotype distribution and frequency of resistance to various antimicrobials

From: Salmonella serotypes and their antimicrobial susceptibility in apparently healthy dogs in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Antimicrobials tested Salmonella serotypes and No.(%) of isolates aresistant to various antimicrobials (n = 42)       
Bronx Newport Indiana Kentucky Saintpaul Typhimurium Virchow Anatum Haifa Braenderup Chailey Minnesota Muenchen Tarshyne No.(%) resistant
  n = 7 n = 6 n = 4 n = 4 n = 4 n = 4 n = 4 n = 2 n = 2 n = 1 n = 1 n = 1 n = 1 n = 1  
AM 2(28.6) 4(66.7) 1(25) 1(25) 3(75) - - - 1(50) - 1(100) - - - 13(30.9)
AMC 1(14.3) 4(66.7) 1(25) 1(25) 3(75) - - - 1(50) - - - - - 11(26.2)
CF 1(14.3) 4(66.7) 1(25) 1(25) 3(75) 1(25) 1(25) - 1(50) - 1(100) - - - 14(33.3)
CRO - - - - - - - - 1(50) - 1(100) - - - 2(4.8)
FOX 1(14.3) - 1(25) 1(25) - - - - 1(50) - - - - - 4(9.5)
AN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0
GM 1(14.3) - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1(2.4)
K - - - - - - - - - 1(100) - - - - 1(2.4)
N 5(71.4) 3(50) 1(25) 2(50) 2(50) - - 2(100) 2(100) 1(100) 1(100) 1(100) 1(100) - 21(50)
S 3(42.9) 3(50) 4(100) 1(25) 1(25) 1(25) - 1(50) 1(50) - 1(100) - - - 16(38.1)
SXT - - 1(25) - 1(25) - - - 1(50) - 1(100) - - - 4(9.5)
CIP - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0
NA - - 1(25) - - - - - - - - - - - 1(2.4)
DO 1(14.3) 5(83.3) 1(25) - 3(75) 1(25) - 1(50) 1(50) - - - - - 13(30.9)
T 3(42.9) 5(83.3) 1(25) 3(75) 4(100) 2(50) 2(50) 2(100) 1(50) 1(100) - 1(100) - - 25(59.5)
C - - 1(25) - 1(25) - - - - - - - - 1(100) 3(7.1)
  1. AN Amikacin, AM Ampicillin, AMC Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, C Chloramphenicol, CF Cephalothin, CRO Ceftriaxone, CIP Ciprofloxcin, FOX Cefoxitin, DO Doxycycline, GM Gentamicin, K Kanamycin, N Neomycin, NA Nalidixic acid, S Streptomycin, SXT Sulfamethoxazole + Trimethoprim, T Oxytetracycline
  2. aIsolates intermediately resistant were also considered resistant