Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of descriptive data analyses comparing the two study cohorts

From: Has intravenous lidocaine improved the outcome in horses following surgical management of small intestinal lesions in a UK hospital population?

Diagnosis/types of small intestinal anastomosis/prokinetic drugs/postoperative reflux

2004–2006 admission years

2012–2014 admission years

χ2 p value

Total

Horses diagnosed with small intestinal lesions

195 (60.6)

147 (55.7)

0.23

342 (58.4)

Common diagnosis categories

Pedunculated lipoma obstruction

52 (25.7)

39 (26.5)

0.98

91 (26.6)

Idiopathic focal eosinophilic enteritis

14 (7.2)

29 (19.7)

0.001

43 (12.6)

Epiploic foramen entrapment

29 (14.9)

14 (9.52)

0.14

43 (12.6)

Ileal impaction

11(3.2)

13 (3.8)

0.7

24 (7)

Equine grass sickness (EGS)

15 (7.7)

9 (6.1)

0.6

24 (7)

Horses undergoing intestinal resection and anastomosis (EGS cases excluded)

115 (63.9)

56 (41.8)

<0.001

171 (54.5)

Side-to-side jejunocaecal anastomosis

42 (24.3)

12 (9)

0.001

54 (17.2)

Side-to-side ileocecal anastomosis

3 (1.7)

0 (0.0)

-

3 (0.96)

Side-to-side jejunojejunal anastomosis

4 (2.2)

0 (0.0)

-

4 (1.3)

End-to-end jejunoileal anastomosis

9 (5)

15 (11.2)

0.04

24 (7.6)

End-to-end jejunojejunal anastomosis

57 (31.7)

29 (21.6)

0.049

86 (27.4)

Prokinetic drugs used (EGS cases excluded)

Lidocaine CRI intraoperatively

25 (16.1)

86 (62.3)

<0.001

111 (37.9)

Lidocaine CRI postoperatively

7 (4)

102 (73.9)

<0.001

109 (34.8)

Metoclopramide

1 (0.6)

9 (6.5)

-

10 (3.2)

Erythromycin

0 (0.0)

7 (5.07)

-

7 (2.2)

Lidocaine CRI plus Metoclopramide

0 (0.0)

8 (5.8)

-

8 (2.5)

Postoperative reflux (EGS cases excluded)

30 (16.7)

48 (34.8)

<0.001

78 (24.5)

  1. Results of descriptive data analyses comparing frequencies of small intestinal lesions, common diagnosis categories, types of small intestinal anastomosis performed, prokinetic drugs administered intra- or postoperatively, and postoperative reflux between the two study cohorts. Chi-square (χ2) test p values comparing these frequencies and total frequencies are shown. Descriptive data are presented as numbers (%)