Table 2 Apparent (Ap) and true prevalence (Tp) of rumen fluke per region and number of farms recording FECs in low, medium and high categories
Region | Ap prevalence | True prevalence | Positive | Negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | Â | Low | Medium | High | Â |
Region 1 High sheep densitiy | 87,7 | 79 | 116 | 15 | 9 | 33 |
Region 2 Low sheep density | 80,4 | 72,5 | 85 | 6 | 4 | 36 |