Skip to main content

Table 2 Antimicrobial consumption in pigs in the Netherlands in 2012 expressed in numbers of DDDANL/Y, ADDDK/Y and DADDDK/Y per therapeutic group and per farm type and the proportion of DADDDK/Y to DDDANL/Y

From: Influence of applying different units of measurement on reporting antimicrobial consumption data for pig farms

 

DDDANL/Y

ADDDK/Y

DADDDK/Y

Proportion DADDDK/Y to DDDANL/Yb (%)

Sows/piglets farms

    

 Amphenicols

0.060

0.030

0.060

100.0

 Aminoglycosides

0.004

0.003

0.003

76.7

 Cephalosporins 3rd/4th gen.

0.001

0.001

0.001

100.0

 Combinations

0.290

0.236

0.185

63.6

 Fluoroquinolones

0.001

0.001

0.001

87.7

 Macrolides/lincosamides

1.776

1.798

1.610

90.7a

 Penicillins

5.685

3.882

3.580

63.0

 Pleuromutilines

0.736

0.513

0.629

85.4

 Polymyxines

1.207

1.199

1.815

150.4

 Tetracyclines

6.931

6.640

5.778

83.3

 Trimethoprim/sulfonamidesc

2.513

1.710

1.659

66.0

 Total

19.20

16.01

15.32

 

Finisher pigs farms

    

 Amphenicols

0.069

0.035

0.069

100.0

 Aminoglycosides

-

-

-

-

 Cephalosporins 3rd/4th gen.

0.000

0.000

0.000

100.0

 Combinations

0.081

0.062

0.051

62.2

 Fluoroquinolones

0.000

0.000

0.000

85.6

 Macrolides/lincosamides

1.254

2.216

2.144

171.0a

 Penicillins

1.003

0.736

0.619

61.7

 Pleuromutilines

0.099

0.073

0.077

78.0

 Polymyxines

0.169

0.167

0.253

149.9

 Tetracyclines

7.454

7.320

6.297

84.5

 Trimethoprim/sulfonamidesc

1.651

0.958

0.918

55.6

 Total

11.78

11.57

10.43

 
  1. aA detailed analysis of this group of antimicrobials is performed on product level. See text for details
  2. bThis calculation is based on the unrounded numbers of DADDDK/Y and DDDANL/Y
  3. cTrimethoprim/sulphonamides by oral use, applied in combination