Skip to main content

Table 7 Summary statistics for the clinician efficacy scores assessed more than 24 hours after surgery

From: Robenacoxib versus meloxicam for the control of peri-operative pain and inflammation associated with orthopaedic surgery in cats: a randomised clinical trial

Response

Visits

Robenacoxib (s.c. + oral)

Meloxicam s.c. + oral placebo

P value (Mann–Whitney test)

Quotient robenacoxib:meloxicam (RMANCOVA)

P value (RMANCOVA)

Transformation for RMANCOVA analysis

  

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

 

Mean

95% CI

 

Exponential

P value for normality (Shapiro-Wilks test)

Global investigator score (primary end point)

V5

1.86 (1.61)

1.98 (1.91)

0.93

0.968

0.682–1.316

0.84

0 (log)

0.53

Posture

V5

0.70 (0.68)

0.78 (0.74)

0.72

1.007

0.527–1.693

0.98

−1 (reciprocal)

<0.0001

Behaviour

V5

0.42 (0.59)

0.54 (0.84)

1.0

1.064

0.565–1.786

0.82

−0.5 (reciprocal of square root)

<0.0001

Pain on palpation/manipulation

V5 & VF

0.44 (0.62)

0.52 (0.84)

0.65

1.032

0.768–1.343

0.82

0.5 (square root)

<0.0001

Overall pain control

V5 & VF

0.76 (0.62)

0.76 (0.71)

0.49

1.143

0.807–1.567

0.42

0.5 (square root)

<0.0001

Inflammation intensity

VF

0.15 (0.04)

0.25 (0.06)

0.16

1.642

0.752–3.695

0.18

0 (log)

<0.0001

  1. CI: confidence interval; s.c.: subcutaneous; VF: final visit.
  2. Values are mean (SD) for each group and quotient values with 95% CI for the ratio robenacoxib/meloxicam. Data are from assessments at V5 and VF.
  3. Non-inferiority of robenacoxib versus meloxicam was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was >0.75 (shown in bold). P values <0.05 are also shown in bold.
  4. The global investigator score (the primary end point) ranged from 0 to 9. All other end points (secondary end points) ranged from 0 to 3.