Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary statistics for the clinician efficacy scores in the first 24 hours after surgery

From: Robenacoxib versus meloxicam for the control of peri-operative pain and inflammation associated with orthopaedic surgery in cats: a randomised clinical trial

Response

Visits

Robenacoxib (s.c. + oral)

Meloxicam s.c. + oral placebo

P value (Mann–Whitney test)

Quotient robenacoxib:meloxicam (RMANCOVA)

P value (RMANCOVA)

Transformation for RMANCOVA analysis

  

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

 

Mean

95% CI

 

Transformation

P value for normality (Shapiro-Wilks test)

Global investigator score (primary end point)

V2-V4

2.72 (1.42)

2.80 (1.62)

0.76

1.029

0.847–1.231

0.76

0 (log)

0.20

Posture

V2-V4

0.68 (0.53)

0.79 (0.61)

0.38

1.144

0.821–1.538

0.39

−1 (reciprocal)

<0.0001

Behaviour

V2-V4

0.81 (0.56)

0.88 (0.64)

0.91

1.073

0.827–1.360

0.58

−0.5 (reciprocal of square root)

0.024

Pain on palpation/manipulation

V2-V4

1.22 (0.69)

1.14 (0.69)

0.23

0.979

0.799–1.184

0.82

0.5 (square root)

0.0024

Overall pain control

V2-V4

1.17 (0.76)

1.15 (0.67)

0.89

1.120

0.880–1.408

0.34

0.5 (square root)

0.011

Sedation

V2-V4

0.44 (0.44)

0.40 (0.42)

0.76

0.945

0.396–1.755

0.85

−0.5 (reciprocal of square root)

0.024

  1. CI: confidence interval; s.c.: subcutaneous.
  2. Values are mean (SD) for each group and quotient values with 95% CIs for the ratio robenacoxib/meloxicam. Data are from the assessments at V2, V3 and V4. Non-inferiority of robenacoxib versus meloxicam was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was >0.75 (shown in bold). P values <0.05 are also shown in bold.
  3. The global investigator score (the primary end point) ranged from 0 to 9. All other end points (secondary end points) ranged from 0 to 3.