Dogs with separation-related problems show a “less pessimistic” cognitive bias during treatment with fluoxetine (Reconcile™) and a behaviour modification plan

Table 4 Median adjusted speeds with fastest and slowest speeds in parentheses toward ambiguous probes at baseline and during treatment

Probe	Group	Baseline	Week +2	Week +6
MID	CLINICAL GROUP	34.0^b (2.1, 82.2)	4.6 (−11.3, 139.6)	2.5^b (−5.3, 7.0)
	CONTROL GROUP	13.3^d,e (6.1, 40.6)	53.1 ^d (22.7, 116.4)	81.9^e (24.5, 221.8)
NR+	CLINICAL GROUP	11.8^c (−0.1, 61.5)	0.4 (−21.2, 11.0)	0.8^c (−3.8, 1.0)
	CONTROL GROUP	3^f,g (0.1, 23.7)	12.7 ^f (4, 92.3)	21 ^g (3.9, 67.1)
NR-	CLINICAL GROUP	68.9^a (39.9, 141.9)	56.9 (6.88, 157.7)	52.3 (23.4, 100.0)
	CONTROL GROUP	21.2^a,h,i (7.5, 84.5)	59.6^h (22.1, 584.6)	72.1ⁱ (62.9, 129)

0 = Adjusted Speed towards Food Position and 100 = Adjusted speed towards Non-food position.
Values with the same superscript letter were found to be significantly different.