From: Methodological comparisons for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in feedlot cattle
Resistance outcome in fecal E. coli3 | Sample Time | M. haemolyticaCulture Status4 | OR5 | 95% CI6 | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ampicillin | First | Positive | 1.2 | 0.3 – 4.8 | 0.78 |
Negative | ref | ||||
Second | Positive | 3.3 | 0.4 – 26.8 | 0.19 | |
Negative | ref | ||||
Streptomycin | First | Positive | 0.4 | 0.2 – 0.9 | 0.04 |
Negative | ref | ||||
Second | Positive | 0.5 | 0.1 – 2.3 | 0.46 | |
Negative | ref | ||||
Sulfisoxazole | First | Positive | 0.8 | 0.4 – 1.7 | 0.56 |
Negative | ref | ||||
Second | Positive | 1.5 | 0.5 – 4.4 | 0.50 | |
Negative | ref | ||||
Teteracyline | First | Positive | 1.1 | 0.5 – 2.5 | 0.82 |
Negative | ref | ||||
Second | Positive | 0.9 | 0.4 – 2.2 | 0.90 | |
Negative | ref |