Skip to main content

Table 9 Description of access to veterinary services and disease control practices in the farm as reported during the calf recruitment visit

From: Design and descriptive epidemiology of the Infectious Diseases of East African Livestock (IDEAL) project, a longitudinal calf cohort study in western Kenya

  

Frequency

Percent

Access to veterinary services

544

  

Yes

 

461

84.7

No

 

83

15.3

Type of Veterinary support

461

  

Private animal health worker

 

264

57.3

Government animal health worker

 

176

38.2

Veterinary drug supplier

 

23

5.0

Farmer

 

10

2.2

Tick-control

548

  

Yes

 

498

90.9

No

 

50

9.1

Application method

498

  

Spraying whole body

 

462

92.7

Spraying legs only

 

9

1.8

Pour on

 

6

1.2

Hand dressing

 

25

5.0

Dipping

 

8

1.6

Other (traditional,manual removal)

 

10

2

Worm control

548

  

Yes

 

309

56.4

No

 

239

43.6

Application method

309

  

Drench

 

265

85.8

Bollet

 

47

15.2

Others (injectables/unknown)

 

2

0.6

Traditional

 

5

1.6

Trypanosome control

548

  

Yes

 

98

17.9

No

 

450

82.1

Method used

98

  

Spraying whole body

 

51

52.0

Chemotherapy

 

32

32.7

Pour-on

 

10

10.2

Other (dipping/head dressing/

   

unknown)

 

8

8.2

Use of Vaccines

546

  

Yes

 

284

52.0

No

 

262

48.0

Frequency of use

277

  

Routinely

 

9

2.9

When need arises

 

269

97.1

Vaccine type used

284

  

Unknown

 

230

81.0

Anthrax

 

8

2.8

Black quarter

 

11

3.9

Contagious Bovine Pleural Pneumonia

 

1

0.4

Foot and mouth disease

 

25

8.8

Lumpy skin disease

 

18

6.3

Other

 

6

2.1