Skip to main content

Table 1 Beta coefficients and Odds ratios for the final model.

From: A Bayesian approach to study the risk variables for tuberculosis occurrence in domestic and wild ungulates in South Central Spain

 

Type of variable

Beta coefficients

Odds ratios

  

Median

95% CI

90% CI

Median

95% CI

90% CI

Intercept

 

−1.07

[−1.53, -0.64]

[−1.42, -0.73]

0.34

[0.22, 0.53]

[0.24, 0.48]

Proportion of cattle farms becoming bTB positive from 2005 to 2006 (%)

QS

0.62(a)(b)

[0.06, 1.22]

[0.18, 1.09]

1.86(a)(b)

[1.06, 3.39]

[1.19, 2.97]

Mean number of hunting seasons in which the hunting estates of the municipality have been inspected

QS

0.55(a)(b)

[0.09, 1.02]

[0.19, 0.91]

1.73(a)(b)

[1.09, 2.77]

[1.21, 2.49]

Apparent TB prevalence in wild boars in the municipality in the game season 2006-07

QS

0.66(a)(b)

[0.18, 1.28]

[0.27, 1.14]

1.94(a)(b)

[1.20, 3.59]

[1.32, 3.11]

Number of sampled cattle in the cattle farms included in the sanitary plan in 2006

QS

0.61(b)

[−0.05, 1.30]

[0.10, 1.14]

1.85(b)

[0.96, 3.66]

[1.10, 3.13]

Number of cattle farms with at least one bTB-positive animal in 2006

QS

0.66(b)

[−0.04, 1.38]

[0.11, 1.22]

1.94(b)

[0.96, 3.98]

[1.11, 3.40]

Number of “TB-positive” red deers in the municipality in the game season 2006-07

QS

0.53(b)

[−0.08, 1.22]

[0.05, 1.06]

1.69(b)

[0.93, 3.38]

[1.05, 2.90]

Proportion of cattle farms classified as extensive beef breeding farms in 2006 (%)

QS

0.39(b)

[−0.09, 0.87]

[0.01, 0.76]

1.47(b)

[0.92, 2.39]

[1.02, 2.14]

Number of farms devoted to bullfighting cattle in 2006

QS

0.14

[−0.24, 0.56]

[−0.16, 0.47]

1.15

[0.79, 1.76]

[0.85, 1.60]

  1. (QS) = quantitative standardized variable; (D) = dichotomous variable (codified considering the median).
  2. (a): Significant coefficients of the final model using the 95% CI.
  3. (b): Significant coefficients of the final model using the 90% CI.