Groups | No. | No. survival | Survival rate (%) | ORT recovery | H9N2 recovery |
---|
1 | 10 | 3 | 30.0 | 3 | 3 |
2 | 10 | 2 | 20.0 | 2 | 2 |
3 | 10 | 7 | 70.0 | 7 | 7 |
4 | 10 | 5 | 50.0 | 5 | 5 |
5 | 10 | 9 | 90.0 | 9 | 9 |
6 | 10 | 10 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 |
- Indications:
- Group 1 chickens were inoculated intraperitoneally with 10 LD50 of ORT/chicken/Shandong/2011 in 0.5 ml, and 100 ELD50 of H9N2/chicken/Shandong/2011 was administrated intranasallyin 0.2 ml at the same time.
- Group 2 chickens were given 10 LD50 of ORT/chicken/Shandong/2011intraperitoneally in 0.5 ml and received 100 ELD50 of H9N2/chicken/Shandong/2011intranasallyin 0.2 ml three days later.
- Group 3 birds were inoculated intranasally with 100 ELD50 of H9N2/chicken/Shandong/2011in 0.2 ml and three days later received intraperitoneally with 10 LD50 of ORT/chicken/Shandong/2011in 0.5 ml.
- Group 4 birds were inoculated intraperitoneally with 10 LD50 of ORT/chicken/Shandong/2011in 0.5 ml.
- Group 5 chickens were given 100 ELD50 of H9N2/chicken/Shandong/2011intranasally in 0.2 ml.
- Group 6 birds received the sterile physiological saline intraperitoneally as a negative controlin 0.5 ml.