Skip to main content

Table 2 Salmonella serotypes by sample type

From: Efficacy of European starling control to reduce Salmonella enterica contamination in a concentrated animal feeding operation in the Texas panhandle

Serotype (% of Salmonella positive samples)

Rank

Cattle feed bunks

Cattle water troughs

Cattle feces

Total

1

Montevideo (33.3)

Montevideo (36.0)

Montevideo (42.0)

Montevideo (40.6)

2

Meleagridis (33.3)

Anatum (36.0)

Anatum (18.8)

Anatum (25.7)

3

Anatum (22.2)

Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (6.0)

Not serotyped (15.9)

Not serotyped (10.9)

4

Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (11.1)

Not serotyped (6.0)

Agona (7.2)

Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (4.6)

5

 

Lille (4.0)

Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (4.3)

Agona (3.9)

6

 

Multiple serotypes (4.0)

Multiple serotypes (4.3)

Multiple serotypes (3.9)

7

 

Meunchen (2.0)

Kentucky (1.5)

Meleagridis (3.1)

8

 

Meleagridis (2.0)

Kiambu (1.5)

Lille (1.6)

9

 

Newport (2.0)

Lexington_var._15+ (1.5)

Newport (1.6)

10

 

3,10: nonmotile (2.0)

Newport (1.5)

3,10: nonmotile (0.7)

11

  

Rough O: gms:- (1.5)

Kentucky (0.7)

12

   

Kiambu (0.7)

13

   

Lexington_var._15+ (0.7)

14

   

Meunchen (0.7)

15

   

Rough O: gms:- (0.7)

Total no.

9

50

69

128