Skip to main content

Table 2 Salmonella serotypes by sample type

From: Efficacy of European starling control to reduce Salmonella enterica contamination in a concentrated animal feeding operation in the Texas panhandle

Serotype (% of Salmonella positive samples)
Rank Cattle feed bunks Cattle water troughs Cattle feces Total
1 Montevideo (33.3) Montevideo (36.0) Montevideo (42.0) Montevideo (40.6)
2 Meleagridis (33.3) Anatum (36.0) Anatum (18.8) Anatum (25.7)
3 Anatum (22.2) Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (6.0) Not serotyped (15.9) Not serotyped (10.9)
4 Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (11.1) Not serotyped (6.0) Agona (7.2) Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (4.6)
5   Lille (4.0) Rough O: e, h: 1,6 (4.3) Agona (3.9)
6   Multiple serotypes (4.0) Multiple serotypes (4.3) Multiple serotypes (3.9)
7   Meunchen (2.0) Kentucky (1.5) Meleagridis (3.1)
8   Meleagridis (2.0) Kiambu (1.5) Lille (1.6)
9   Newport (2.0) Lexington_var._15+ (1.5) Newport (1.6)
10   3,10: nonmotile (2.0) Newport (1.5) 3,10: nonmotile (0.7)
11    Rough O: gms:- (1.5) Kentucky (0.7)
12     Kiambu (0.7)
13     Lexington_var._15+ (0.7)
14     Meunchen (0.7)
15     Rough O: gms:- (0.7)
Total no. 9 50 69 128