Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariable logistic regression of farm-based factors associated with serological Q fever infection on animal level

From: Seroprevalence and risk factors of Q fever in goats on commercial dairy goat farms in the Netherlands, 2009-2010

Variable

Category

N

Prev. (%)

OR

95% CI

P-value

Herd size (according to UBN registry)

< 800

1164

13.8

Ref

 

0.0017

 

≥ 800

1013

30.2

3.3

1.6-7.0

 

Mandatory vaccination area

Inside

1116

28.2

3.3

1.5-7.3

0.0042

 

Outside

1061

14.3

Ref

  

Goat density per km2 in 5 km radius from the farm

< 25

1167

18.2

Ref

 

0.0805

 

≥ 25

1010

25.3

1.9

0.9-3.9

 

Cattle density per km2 in farm municipality (excl. meat calves)

< 100

643

11.2

Ref

 

0.0084

 

≥ 100

1534

25.8

3.5

1.4-8.9

 

Distance to nearest bulk milk PCR-positive farm (km)

0- < 4

688

37.8

5.0

2.2-11.6

< .0001

 

4- < 8

400

25.3

3.2

1.1-8.9

 
 

≥ 8

1089

9.7

Ref

  

Anglo-Nubian goat

Present

402

11.9

0.5

0.2-1.1

0.0694

 

Absent

1775

23.6

Ref

  

Number of stables

1-2 stables

983

14.2

Ref

 

0.0046

 

≥ 3 stables

1194

27.4

3.0

1.4-6.5

 

Use of artificial insemination

Yes

572

34.6

2.7

1.3-5.6

0.0181

 

No

1585

17.0

Ref

  

Presence of laying hens at the farm

Yes

359

8.9

0.3

0.1-0.9

0.0184

 

No

1818

23.9

Ref

  

Having at least one dog at the farm

Yes

1927

23.5

Ref

 

0.0530

 

No

250

5.6

0.2

0.0-1.0

 

Having at least one rabbit at the farm

Yes

608

6.4

0.2

0.1-0.6

0.0008

 

No

1569

27.3

Ref

  

Having at least one pet bird at the farm

Yes

501

9.4

0.3

0.1-0.9

0.0132

 

No

1676

25.1

Ref

  

Cat(s) in goat stable

Yes

786

24.2

1.7

0.8-3.4

0.1718

 

No/unknown

1391

19.9

Ref

  

Signs of vermin (mice, rats, birds) in roughage or litter during past 12 months

Unknown

364

41.8

2.8

1.2-6.2

0.0471

 

Yes or No

1813

17.4

Ref

  

Feeding silage

Yes

1498

26.1

Ref

 

0.0218

 

No

679

11.2

0.4

0.2-0.9

 

Feeding maize

Yes

872

28.8

Ref

 

0.0333

 

No

1305

16.6

0.5

0.2-0.9

 

Use of lucerne, pulp feed or other roughage/litter

Yes

505

28.1

1.8

0.9-3.7

0.1445

 

No

1672

19.4

Ref

  

Feeding method

With hand/wheelbarrow

772

13.5

0.3

0.1-0.9

0.0299

 

With fodder mixer

1191

27.0

Ref

  
 

Automatic

214

19.6

0.5

0.1-1.9

 

Type of ventilation system of stables

Mechanic ventilation

593

30.5

2.0

1.0-4.3

0.0899

 

No mechanic ventilation

1584

18.1

Ref

  

Use of windbreak curtain and/or windshields

Windbreak curtain

799

30.5

3.7

1.5-9.3

0.0198

 

Only wind shields

937

18.8

1.6

0.6-4.3

 
 

None

441

10.7

Ref

  

Presence of nuisance animals (e.g. wild birds) in the stable

Yes, many

388

12.6

0.6

0.2-2.0

0.1206

 

Yes, few

880

27.3

1.7

0.8-3.7

 
 

No

889

20.0

Ref

  

Combat of nuisance animals (e.g. wild birds) in 2008

Via covering air spaces

349

38.7

3.0

1.4-6.3

0.0721

 

Yes, only via other ways (e.g. capture cage)

274

21.2

1.3

0.4-4.3

 
 

Not applicable

1554

17.6

Ref

  

Spread of manure

To other places/not applicable

352

30.7

2.1

1.0-4.7

0.1076

 

On farmland or near environment

1825

19.7

Ref

  

Lambing periods in 2009

≤ 1

1351

15.6

Ref

 

0.0039

 

> 1

826

31.0

3.0

1.5-6.1

 

Percentage of aborting goats or goats with stillbirth in 2007-2009

or known history of abortion wave due to Q fever since 2005

< 4%

1882

18.4

Ref

 

0.0251

 

≥ 4%

295

40.7

3.4

1.5-7.6

 

Type of Tenure

Completely closed

590

29.5

2.3

1.0-5.0

0.0898

 

Only closed for female goats

1217

16.1

Ref

  
 

Not closed

349

27.8

2.2

0.8-5.6

 

Provinces where supplied animals originated

Provinces of Friesland and/or Overijssel

639

8.0

0.3

0.1-0.7

0.0028

 

Supply from other provinces or no supply

1538

27.1

Ref

  
  1. Factors associated with Q fever with their frequency (N), animal prevalence (Prev), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with P value of the univariable generalized linear regression < 0.20 on animal level accounting for random herd effect (2,177 animals from 96 farms; 21.4% seropositive animals and 43.1% positive farms based on total sample of 123 farms and 2,828 goats)