Skip to main content

Table 2 Results for laboratory tests and response categories for dogs with idiopathic IMHA treated according to the AP protocol (n = 149) or the P protocol (n = 73) group at the time of the first and second return visits and relapse

From: Lack of evidence of a beneficial effect of azathioprine in dogs treated with prednisolone for idiopathic immune-mediated hemolytic anemia: a retrospective cohort study

 

Azathioprine-Prednisolone Protocol

 

Prednisolone Protocol

 

First return visit

Median

Range

n

Reference

Median

Range

n

Pb

Hematocrit (%)

0.35

0.06-0.5

93

42-57

0.36

0.12-0.47

41

0.5

Thrombocytes (x109/L)

402

8-986

88

150-400

421

20-1555

29

0.48

Reticulocytes (%)

0.9

0.1-28

87

< 2

2

0.2-6.4

34

0.027*

Osmotic red cell fragility (mOsm/L)

176

136-258

82

< 162

164

125-247

24

0.06

Time after diagnosis g (days)

25

2-83

95

 

17

0-141

43

0.001*

Response category a

No. dogs

 

n

 

No. dogs

 

n

Pb

No responsec

3

 

95

 

1

 

26

 

Improvementd

87

 

95

 

25

 

26

 

Complete recoverye

5

 

95

 

0

 

26

0.92

Second return visit

Median

Range

n

Reference

Median

Range

n

Pb

Hematocrit (%)

0.4

0.11-0.54

66

42-57

0.42

0.18-0.51

24

0.38

Thrombocytes (x109/L)

278

3-834

63

150-400

339

12-636

17

0.73

Reticulocytes (%)

0.8

0.1-12

60

< 2

1

0.3-9.7

18

0.39

Osmotic red cell fragility (mOsm/L)

163

133-238

58

< 162

165

142-206

11

0.40

Time after diagnosis g (days)

77

21-399

69

 

56

21-171

25

0.0032*

Response category a

No. dogs

 

n

 

No. dogs

 

n

Pb

No response

0

 

62

 

0

 

13

 

Improvement

42

 

62

 

12

 

13

 

Complete recovery

20

 

62

 

1

 

13

0.12

Relapse f

Median

Range

n

Reference

Median

Range

n

pb

Hematocrit (%)

0.28

0.06-0.44

17

42-57

0.31

0.10-0.41

5

0.96

Thrombocytes (x109/L)

132

0-382

15

150-400

327

228-426

2

0.15

Reticulocytes (%)

2.5

0.1-22

14

< 2

0.3

0.2-30.5

3

0.9

Osmotic red cell fragility (mOsm/L)

212

159-274

12

< 162

221

187-254

2

0.65

Time after diagnosisg (days)

112

32-1757

21

 

63

7-581

8

0.27

  1. aNumber of dogs counted in each response category.
  2. b P = P value
  3. c No effect of therapy was defined as no increase in the hematocrit.
  4. d Improvement was defined as an increase in hematocrit to < 0.36 L/L, or a hematocrit >0.36 L/L but with a positive Coombs' test or an increased osmotic red cell fragility.
  5. e Complete recovery was defined as an increase in the hematocrit to >0.36 L/L, a negative Coombs' test, and an osmotic red cell fragility within the reference range.
  6. f Relapse was defined as a decrease in the hematocrit after an initial improvement or complete recovery in combination with the recurrence of a positive Coombs' test or increased red cell fragility.
  7. g The times of the first and second return visits or when a relapse occurred were retrieved from the medical record.