Skip to main content

Table 3 Haugh unit of eggs, faecal pH, lactic acid bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae counts following treatments supplemented with different postbiotic metabolite combinations

From: Effects of feeding different postbiotic metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarumstrains on egg quality and production performance, faecal parameters and plasma cholesterol in laying hens

  

Treatments

 

Weeks

Control

COM246

COM345

COM456

Haugh unit

    

 24

68.89 ± 0.81

69.24 ± 0.72

68.26 ± 0.85

68.62 ± 0.78

 26

67.13 ± 0.93

67.42 ± 0.94

67.34 ± 0.86

66.94 ± 0.79

 28

67.77 ± 0.93

67.80 ± 0.95

67.32 ± 0.86

66.75 ± 0.75

 30

73.32 ± 0.87

72.97 ± 0.66

73.36 ± 0.74

72.82 ± 0.60

 32

73.50 ± 0.82

73.29 ± 0.63

73.17 ± 0.87

72.92 ± 0.71

pH

    

 24

7.04 ± 0.03

7.05 ± 0.04

7.01 ± 0.05

7.03 ± 0.03

 26

6.98 ± 0.04

7.02 ± 0.03

6.99 ± 0.03

7.01 ± 0.04

 28

7.02 ± 0.04a

6.98 ± 0.04a

7.00 ± 0.02a

6.82 ± 0.05b

 30

6.98 ± 0.05a

6.86 ± 0.04b

6.87 ± 0.05b

6.78 ± 0.03c

 32

6.94 ± 0.06a

6.65 ± 0.05b

6.54 ± 0.04c

6.52 ± 0.05c

Lactic acid bacteria counts (log CFU/g)

 24

6.45 ± 0.03

6.48 ± 0.06

6.42 ± 0.06

6.41 ± 0.07

 26

6.39 ± 0.11

6.32 ± 0.07

6.31 ± 0.12

6.34 ± 0.08

 28

6.48 ± 0.12

6.57 ± 0.10

6.53 ± 0.11

6.60 ± 0.19

 30

6.56 ± 0.18b

6.61 ± 0.16b

6.68 ± 0.14b

6.92 ± 0.11a

 32

6.62 ± 0.16c

6.91 ± 0.18b

6.68 ± 0.13c

7.28 ± 0.10a

 34

6.45 ± 0.21c

6.88 ± 0.18b

6.90 ± 0.10b

7.32 ± 0.12a

Enterobacteriaceae counts (log CFU/g)

 24

7.43 ± 0.08

7.47 ± 0.06

7.51 ± 0.05

7.56 ± 0.09

 26

7.50 ± 0.05

7.52 ± 0.06

7.51 ± 0.06

7.46 ± 0.07

 28

7.38 ± 0.10

7.41 ± 0.18

7.32 ± 0.14

7.25 ± 0.12

 30

7.16 ± 0.08a

6.89 ± 0.09b

6.78 ± 0.10b

6.83 ± 0.07b

 32

6.92 ± 0.16a

6.33 ± 0.11c

6.55 ± 0.08b

6.31 ± 0.12c

  1. 1Means in the same row not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05).
  2. 2SEM: Data are means of 25 cages of 2 hens per cage per treatment.