Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the TNCC and two-part differential cell count results from the Sysmex XN-V BF mode with those from the manual method

From: Comparison of Sysmex XN-V body fluid mode and deep-learning-based quantification with manual techniques for total nucleated cell count and differential count for equine bronchoalveolar lavage samples

Parameter

Passing-Bablok regression analysis

(95% CI Slope and Intercept)

Bias Bland–Altman difference plot

(95% CI)

r

p-value

BF-TNCC before regating

y = 58 + 1.55x

(Slope: 1.23 to 1.88

Intercept:—8.66 to 107.8)

171.3 cells/µL

(136.44 to 206.33)

0.79

< 0.001

BF-TNCC after regating

y = 42.18 + 1.61x

(Slope: 1.33 to 2.04

Intercept:—14.50 to 106.3)

187.9 cells/µL

(154.37 to 221.40)

0.79

< 0.001

BF-WBC before regating

y = 39 + 1.48x

(Slope: 1.67 to 1.83

Intercept: -19.75 to 93.00)

138.5 cells/µL

(102.22 to 174.82)

0.78

< 0.001

BF-WBC after regating

y = 42.18 + 1.61x

(Slope: 1.61 to 2.02

Intercept: -11.30 to 106.00)

187.9 cells/µL

(154.37 to 221.40)

0.79

< 0.001

BF-MN% before regating

N

- 48.05%

(- 54.31 to—41.79)

- 0.33

< 0.001

BF-MN% after regating

y = 15.39 + 0.83x

(Slope: 0.65 to 0.94

Intercept: 4.36 to 32.68)

0.90%

(-1.09 to 2.89)

0.84

0.92

BF-PMN% before regating

N

48.00%

(41.76 to 54.25)

- 0.32

< 0.001

BF-PMN% after regating

y = 2.039 + 0.83x

(Slope: 0.66 to 0.94

Intercept: 1.06 to 3.16)

- 0.94%

(- 2.94 to 1.06)

0.83

0.88

  1. BF Body fluid, CI Confidence interval, MN Mononuclear, N Noncalculable, PMN Polymorphonuclear, p-value Wilcoxon signed-rank test, r Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, TNCC Total nucleated cell count, WBC White blood cell