Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the Passing–Bablok regression of the agreement between measurements taken by USG examinations and CT studies

From: An abattoir study of the prevalence of foot lesions and claw measurements in water buffalo in Egypt

Measures

Intercept

CI of the intercepta

Slope

CI of the slopea

ICC

ICC CIb

LC M1

Corium

2

1.1, 4.7

0.32

-0.30, 0.55

0.11

-0.08, 0.32

Sole horn

-4

-8.6, -0.50

2.3

1.5, 3.4

0.34

-0.10, 0.66

MC M1

Corium

1.6

0.53, 4.8

0.40

-0,41, 0.62

0.27

-0.07, 0.55

Sole horn

0.1

-2.8, 1.7

1.5

1.1, 2.1

0.33

-0.10, 0.67

LC M2

Corium

3.5

2.1, 5.3

0.60

0.40, 0.80

0.55

0.34, 0.71

Sole horn

-2.4

-3.90, -0.65

1.54

1.30, 1.80

0.67

0.38, 0.82

MC M2

Corium

3.3

2.2, 4.9

0.45

0.27, 0.60

0.42

0.14, 0.63

Sole horn

-1.7

-3.2, -0.60

1.6

1.4, 1.9

0.52

-.05, 0.79

LC M3

Corium

0.61

-1.3, 2.3

0.96

0.75, 1.2

0.64

0.38, 0.80

Sole horn

-1.1

-2.6, 0.15

1.3

1.1, 1.5

0.74

0.45, 0.87

MC M3

Corium

1.1

-0.26, 2.2

0.75

0.60, 0.93

0.34

0.12, 0.56

Sole horn

-1.5

-2.7, -0.3

1.5

1.3, 1.8

0.45

-0.04, 0.73

  1. M1, M2 and M3 are measures taken at the distal tip of the 3rd phalanx, the most concave portion, and the flexor tubercle of the 3rd phalanx, respectively. CI = 95% confidence interval, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient
  2. aPresence of zero in the CI of intercept, and one in the CI of slope indicate the two methods are comparable
  3. bAbsence of zero in the CI of ICC indicate rejection of null hypothesis of no agreement