Criteria | Scores | Coef | Total (score*coef) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease knowledge | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2.5 | /100 |
1. Speed of spread | |||||||
2. Number of species involved | |||||||
3. Persistence of infectious agent in the environment | |||||||
4. Risk of spread to susceptible populations | |||||||
5. Potential for silent spread | |||||||
6. Wildlife reservoir and potential spread | |||||||
7. Vector reservoir and potential spread | |||||||
8. Variability of the agent | |||||||
9. Understanding of fundamental immunology | |||||||
10. Host pathogen interaction | |||||||
Impact on animal health and welfare | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8.33 | /100 |
1. Disease impact on production | |||||||
2. Duration of animal welfare impact | |||||||
3. Proportion of animals affected and suffering pain/injury/distress as a result of the disease | |||||||
Impact on public health – human health | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4.16 | /100 |
1. Impact of occurrence on human health | |||||||
2. Likelihood of occurrence | |||||||
3. Impact of occurrence on food safety | |||||||
4. Transmissibility (spread from animals to humans) | |||||||
5. Spread in humans | |||||||
6. Bioterrorism potential | |||||||
Impact on wider society | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8.33 | /100 |
1. Economic direct impact (including cumulative cost, e.g. enzootic vs. epizootic) | |||||||
2. Economic indirect impact (social, market) | |||||||
3. Agriterrorism potential | |||||||
Impact on trade | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6.25 | /100 |
1. Impact on international trade due to existing regulations | |||||||
2. Impact on EC trade due to existing regulations | |||||||
3. Potential for regionalisation | |||||||
4. Impact on security of food supply | |||||||
Control tools | +2 | +1 | 0 | −1 | −2 | 16.66 | /100 |
1. Appropriate diagnostics | |||||||
2. Appropriate vaccines | |||||||
3. Appropriate pharmaceuticals | |||||||
Total Score |