Table 4 Prevalences of additional atypical scrapie (AS) cases by control strategy and country from flocks in which the first scrapie animal had either AS or classical scrapie (CS)
Strategy | Country | Cases | Tests | Prevalence (per 10,000) | CI 95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intensified monitoring in AS positive flocks | Finland | 0 | 36 | 0 | 0 - 973.9 |
| Â | France | 11 | 14965 | 7.4 | 3.7 - 13.1 |
| Â | Greece | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 - 535.7 |
| Â | Norway | 0 | 75 | 0 | 0 - 480.0 |
| Â | Portugal | 3 | 4612 | 6.5 | 1.3 - 19.0 |
| Â | Sweden | 0 | 47 | 0 | 0.0 - 754.9 |
Intensified monitoring in CS positive flocks | France | 7 | 31113 | 2.2 | 0.9 - 4.6 |
Selective culling in AS positive flocks | Belgium | 0 | 223 | 0 | 0 - 164.1 |
| Â | Denmark | 0 | 168 | 0 | 0 - 217.2 |
| Â | France | 5 | 10462 | 4.8 | 1.6 - 11.1 |
| Â | Italy | 1 | 2260 | 4.4 | 0.1 - 24.6 |
| Â | The Netherlands | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 - 596.3 |
| Â | Norway | 0 | 1033 | 0 | 0 - 35.6 |
| Â | Portugal | 2 | 1763 | 11.3 | 1.4 - 40.9 |
Selective culling in CS positive flocks | Belgium | 0 | 295 | 0 | 0 - 124.3 |
| Â | France | 4 | 12087 | 3.3 | 0.9 - 8.5 |
| Â | Greece | 3 | 10310 | 2.9 | 0.6 - 8.5 |
| Â | Italy | 2 | 8565 | 2.3 | 0.3 - 8.4 |
Special genetic selection in AS positive flocks | Italy | 0 | 351 | 0 | 0 - 104.5 |
Stamping out in AS positive flocks | Denmark | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 - 1950.6 |
| Â | Finland | 0 | 173 | 0 | 0 - 211.0 |
| Â | Iceland | 1 | 467 | 21.4 | 0.5 - 118.7 |
| Â | Italy | 1 | 1309 | 7.6 | 0.2 - 42.5 |
| Â | Norway | 0 | 1156 | 0 | 0 - 31.9 |
| Â | Sweden | 0 | 195 | 0 | 0 - 187.4 |
Stamping out in CS positive flocks | Iceland | 0 | 367 | 0 | 0 - 100.0 |
| Â | Italy | 0 | 3231 | 0 | 0 - 11.4 |
| Â | Norway | 0 | 343 | 0 | 0 - 107.0 |