Question 1: In my client farms, in which procedures I, II or III are conducted, anaesthesia is still administered by vets of my practice. This applies to .% of my client farms. | Statistical comparison (p-values of cross tabulation and Pearson’s chi square test) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Answers | 0% | 1-33% | 34-66% | 67-99% | 100% | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 2.5% | 28.8% | 25.2% | 35.0% | 8.5% | < 0.0001 | |||
Procedure II | 2.4% | 27.1% | 18.7% | 36.1% | 15.7% | 0.279 | |||
Procedure III | 26.5% | 46.3% | 14.3% | 8.2% | 4.7% | < 0.0001 | |||
Procedures I-III | < 0.0001 | ||||||||
Question 2: As compared to the situation prior to the introduction of the ADM, my practice now performs …. anaesthesia for procedures I, II or III in my client farms. | |||||||||
Answers | Clearly less | Less | Equal | More | Clearly more | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 11.3% | 25.0% | 39.4% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 0.007 | |||
Procedure II | 9.4% | 26.9% | 44.4% | 8.8% | 10.5% | 0.774 | |||
Procedure III | 18.0% | 18.0% | 48.2% | 12.2% | 3.6% | 0.012 | |||
Procedures I-III | 0.022 | ||||||||
Question 3: In my client farms, procedures I, II or III are still performed without anaesthesia. This applies to …% of my client farms. | |||||||||
Answers | 0% | 1-33% | 34-66% | 67-99% | 100% | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 51.8% | 41.4% | 5.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0001 | |||
Procedure II | 39.3% | 50.9% | 6.7% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.122 | |||
Procedure III | 7.6% | 38.6% | 29.7% | 23.4% | 0.7% | 0.0001 | |||
Procedures I-III | 0.0001 | ||||||||
Question 4: In my client farms, external certified lay person administer anaesthesia for procedures I, II or III. This applies to …% of my client farms. | |||||||||
Answers | 0% | 1-33% | 34-66% | 67-99% | 100% | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 49.4% | 43.1% | 4.4% | 3.1% | 0.00% | 0.143 | |||
Procedure II | 66.1% | 30.9% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 0.00% | 0.018 | |||
Procedure III | 45.7% | 40.7% | 11.4% | 2.2% | 0.00% | < 0.0001 | |||
Procedures I-III | < 0.0001 | ||||||||
Question 5: My experience with the ADM showed that my certified clients administer the anaesthesia for procedures I, II or III technically correct. This applies to …% of my client farms. | |||||||||
Answers | 0% | 1-33% | 34-66% | 67-99% | 100% | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 3.8% | 16.7% | 21.2% | 52.5% | 5.8% | 0.001 | |||
Procedure II | 12.9% | 22.7% | 19.0% | 37.4% | 8.0% | < 0.0001 | |||
Procedure III | 12.5% | 36.1% | 27.8% | 22.2% | 1.4% | 0.001 | |||
Procedures I-III | < 0.0001 | ||||||||
Question 7: Some certified farmers realised that administration of anaesthesia for procedures I, II, or III is a demanding task and, therefore, continued to assign their contract veterinary practice to administer anaesthesia. This applies to …% of my client farms. | |||||||||
Answers | 0% | 1-33% | 34-66% | 67-99% | 100% | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 17.8% | 51.4% | 19.8% | 9.6% | 1.4% | < 0.0001 | |||
Procedure II | 15.6% | 50.4% | 19.8% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 0.587 | |||
Procedure III | 50.4% | 31.3% | 14.8% | 3.5% | 0.00% | < 0.0001 | |||
Procedures I-III | < 0.0001 | ||||||||
Question 8: I assess the ADM as … model to reinforce the legal obligation to administer local anaesthesia for procedures I, II, or III. | |||||||||
Answers | Very poor | Poor | Moderate | Good | Very good | vs proc I | vs proc II | vs proc III | overall |
Procedure I | 6.8% | 18.4% | 28.8% | 35.0% | 11.0% | 0.004 | |||
Procedure II | 6.2% | 17.3% | 40.7% | 29.0% | 6.8% | 0.202 | |||
Procedure III | 15.2% | 22.8% | 35.1% | 22.8% | 4.1% | 0.043 | |||
Procedures I-III | 0.005 |